Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 186.17954%

How to get a Dark Side of Moon Snare type of sound? Last viewed: 0 seconds ago

Loading...

Hi, this is something I've been doing for years, trying to get this sound. It's a lot harder with a limited budget no doubt about it.

I have a few specific questions that I hope the more experienced drummers will have some clues about this. First of all, I'm dealing with a 1976 Ludwig Supraphonic whos heads (top and bottom) are both proabably shot. The snare is one of those wide ones (double wide) that I bought new about 4 years ago and never used...so I can tell it's still good and shinny.

However, I don't know where to begin with obtaining this nick Mason Dark Side sound. Every time I tune my snare drum lower I get oddball metallic type of sounds. I realize that I can't expect my snare to sound like a polished recording like Dark Side, but at the same time I can't help but notice my snare aint sounding too healthy. It's not fat and punchy like I think it could be and it seems like it's not thriving sound wise.

So to start, are there any pro tips for tuning a snare like this? Do you start with the bottom head? And as far as heads are concerned, I realize this is not 1973 anymore but what heads do they produce now that would be closest to what Nick was using then? What kind of top head should I buy, what kind of bottom? Money is no object here.

Also, does the Dark Side sound like one of those double-wide snares or an ordinary size one? For some reason, I seem to like the punch of the ordinary size wires, but this wide one I'm now using does have a very nice, full brilliant sound! While I don't have a vintage KM84, I do have a '70s EV 1776 mic on the top and serial dated 1978 EV RE-11 on the bottom. This is the sound I've been able to get so far:

http://psychedelicsound.yolasite.com/resources/Supraphonic2.mp3

Thanks for any input ahead of time!

[IMG]http://psychedelicsound.yolasite.com/resources/IMG_1855.JPG.opt698x580o0%2C0s698x580.JPG[/IMG]

Posted on 11 years ago
#1
Loading...

This is a cool read, doesn't mention stats on Dark Side though.

http://sparebricks.fika.org/sbzine23/ggg.html

In a land of chimpanzees I was a monkey.
Posted on 11 years ago
#2
Posts: 1040 Threads: 106
Loading...

From El Larry

This is a cool read, doesn't mention stats on Dark Side though.http://sparebricks.fika.org/sbzine23/ggg.html

I think there are several mistakes in this article. For example, the it states that Mason used 12" hats and Zildjian cymbals for Live at Pompeii. Just watch the movie and see for yourself that none of that is true. Zildjians don't look or sound like that and those hats are clearly bigger than his 12" rack tom.

Also... 16" snare drum? What?

I don't know about the rest of what the article says but it certainly omits his clear Fibes kit, for example.

Sysl krysu nenahradi!

-196?-72 6ply White Oyster Amati
-1960s 3ply Red Sparkle Amati
- Zildjian, Paiste, Zyn, Istanbul

http://bandzone.cz/blueswan
Posted on 11 years ago
#3
Loading...

That article has more than a few errors is right.

To the OP,I think you're chasing a sound that is more studio engineered/ generated than what live acoustic drums really sound like.

They were also recorded in Abbey Road studios,probably using then state of the art gear.

By double wide( I've never heard that term used before,except for trailers) do you mean snare wires,like 42 strands?As far as drum heads,Ludwig and Remo stuff we have now,is pretty close to what was available in 72/73,when the album was recorded.

Steve B

Posted on 11 years ago
#4
Loading...

Dude, how much compression is being added to that drum? The sound is muffled and muddy. Something, some effect, is being post-edited in after the drum is recorded, that is burying/killing the sound of the snare drum. Does it sound the same way as a raw track? How much are the overheads adding to the mix and where are they positioned? Is there a low ceiling in the recording space?

The sound of the snare drum needs to open up. Lose whatever is causing the muffling effect. I bet it'll sound great without any post-editing crapolla added.

John

Too many great drums to list here!

http://www.walbergandauge.com/VintageVenue.htm
Posted on 11 years ago
#5
Posts: 5356 Threads: 87
Loading...

This is a great topic. I've chased that sound for years also. Came close a few times I thought years ago with my old kit. I love that album and it helps the mood playing along if the drums are tuned close. For me anyway. Yep I'm sure as everyone said it's the studio mix. Would be cool to find out exactly how it was done.

Glenn.

Not a guru just havin fun with some old dusty drums.
Posted on 11 years ago
#6
Posts: 6524 Threads: 37
Loading...

Have you tried to ask him on his Facebook page ? His last post was 5 hours ago.

It`s a drum,.....Hit It !!

.....76/#XK9207 Phonic Sound Machine D454/D-505 snares !i
Posted on 11 years ago
#7
Loading...

All the mics are going into a 1978 Teac M15 board, and the stereo buss has stereo limiting inserted (both are 1970s blue-faced Ashly SC-50 compressors).

This is all recorded live, once it's recorded to two track in digital that's it, can't take away or add compression. Anyway I'm just looking for tips on heads and snare wire? Anyone have any insights about what nick might have used for his supraphonic? Please don't let this become another mediocre thread with mindless babbling. I want details. I want to meet other drummers who want details. This is the kind of knowledge that will be lost forever. Pass it on to us youngsters before this stuff dies like the dinosaur!

Posted on 11 years ago
#8
Loading...

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he used a coated amb over a snare side amb with stock Ludwig wires. I don't think that's your real problem. As was said before your limiters are killing your sound. those Ashlys are pretty good for individual tracks but not on the mix bus. Nowhere near transparent enough. You'd be far better off getting as clean a sound as possible to digital and then processing with plug-ins. Your limiters are severely limiting your ability to get a good clean base track. If you can't use them as inserts I wouldn't use them at all. It's just a bad idea to commit to processing within the raw track. Just my opinion of course.

Steve

1967 Slingerland 12,13,16,20 White Satin Flame
1968 Slingerland 12,14,16,20 Light Blue Pearl
Posted on 11 years ago
#9
Loading...

That's what I mean though.....my heads are dead, and I believe the wires are off, the 42 (what I call double wide) are not the right ones. You're thinking the "dark side" snare sound probably was just a standard size snare wire?

As far as the recording, you're actually starting to hurt my feelings lol. In all seriousness, I kinda like the sound, and as far as I can tell some of my favorite drum tracks are compressed '70s sounds. Hell listen to the first Apple ablum, 1969. Right when the band plays the drums get squashed in the background. I love that sort of stuff. That's not my problem though. My problem is that, my Supraphonic does not sound good just being in the room!

So, before I went and bought new stuff for it, I figured I'd ask around and see what people thought Nick might have used so I can buy that stuff. Really, my snare sounds okay but once I tune it to be as "low" as Dark Side sounds, my Supra just starts messing out. I'm looking for basic drum advice I guess. Is there such a thing as a "lemon" supraphonic? It seems REAL touchy.....Sometimes I tune it and it's instant dark Side, but somehow off. I'll make an adjustment and lose that great sound forever!

flowers2

Posted on 11 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here