Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 183.57411%

Slingerland spurs... Last viewed: 2 hours ago

Posts: 6288 Threads: 375
Loading...

I've been seeing these Slingerland mounts and legs in a couple of threads lately, and every now and then on eBay. Model 1280

They are in a 1951 Slingerland accessories catalog (probably elsewhere as well, but that's the only accessories catalog I have), but not on any cataloged Slingerland outfits that I can find.

LandenLarry and SkyDog75 have them on late 50s/early60s bass drums.

The models I'm seeing in catalogs are the 727 folding or 727 telescoping and the 1279 hoop mounted versions, but never the 1280 anywhere.

Anyone have a catalog where the 1280 appears on a bass drum?

Anyway, here's a page from the catalog, and I borrowed a pic from SkyDog75's post for reference....

Help !!

Thanks !!

Kevin
Posted on 15 years ago
#1
Posts: 6288 Threads: 375
Loading...

BumpBumpBump

Kevin
Posted on 15 years ago
#2
Loading...

I don't have any 50's slingerland sets. But the legs look like the ones used on 60's and 70's drums (teardrop pointy end). And the mounts look like the ones used by Gretsch and Ludwig - probably supplied by one of the parts manufacturer's like W&A.

My guess is that they had the leg design done and paired these with the W&A mounts before they got their own design for the heavy mounts that they used on the 60's drums. The 60's design works better (a better angle and much more solid), so this was probably just a temporary solution for them.

I can't help you with catalogs.

Posted on 15 years ago
#3
Posts: 6288 Threads: 375
Loading...

Thanks !!!

I found out recently they appear in later catalogs than the '51, but still not on any cataloged drums.

Kevin
Posted on 15 years ago
#4
Loading...

From 4MoreYearsOhNo

The 60's design works better (a better angle and much more solid)...

From experience working on the drum pictured above, I'd have to agree that these spurs aren't the most solid things. When there's a tom mounted above the bass, the narrow spur setup on a relatively small 20" bass sure makes the rig seem a little top-heavy and unbalanced.

Posted on 15 years ago
#5
Loading...

Although mine are MIJ, I have these on all three of my bass drums, and yes, they are a bit unsteady with a tom hanging wide. But, they are cool, easy to work with and get out of the way quickly and completely.

"Ignorance may be overcome through education. Stupidity, however, is a lifelong endeavor." So, educate me, I don't likes bein' ignant...
"I enjoy restoring 60s Japanese "stencil" drums...I can actually afford them..."I rescue the worst of the old valueless drums for disadvantaged Children and gladly accept donations of parts, pieces and orphans, No cockroaches, please...
http://www.youtube.com/user/karstenboy
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Coffee...16613138379603
Posted on 15 years ago
#6
Posts: 6288 Threads: 375
Loading...

From SkyDog75

From experience working on the drum pictured above, I'd have to agree that these spurs aren't the most solid things. When there's a tom mounted above the bass, the narrow spur setup on a relatively small 20" bass sure makes the rig seem a little top-heavy and unbalanced.

SkyDog

Are they original to the drum?

No extra holes?

Would the other, more common mounts use the same holes?

Thanks

Kevin
Posted on 15 years ago
#7
Loading...

i am glad you posted this thread i have been trying so hard to get research on the bass drums, along with pics. i picked my bass off of a guy in texas who got it from his dad he told me, his dad bought it before he was born and it must have been bought in the sixties. when i bought it did not have badge so i was very sceptical, but after i got it and looked at the pictures that were on this sight, plus the guy telling me it had a gold sparkle wrap, that he thought looked ugly, wich was overlaped in the wood. that he removed then lost the badge, i came to the conclusion he wasnt lying. but i still question the legs and the hole on the side. here are some pics.

4 attachments
Posted on 15 years ago
#8
Posts: 6288 Threads: 375
Loading...

The wrap being incorporated into the scarf stopped after 1956.

Your tympani style t-handles support that age.

The pic you have of the leg is not much use, it is obscured by the lug next to it.

Is there evidence of extra or modified holes at the mount site?

Can you post some pics of that area?

Are you familiar with the more often seen leg mounts, and does it look like they would fit?

Here's a top side , flip side, and flip side with backing plate pic of the more common mount.

Kevin
Posted on 15 years ago
#9
Loading...

here are some pics, the first couple of pics are where the wrap was under the wood. you can see it but bearly. this guy told me it was a pain to get off. after he got it off he was going to re wrap it but it was to expensive so he stained it. after it sat for a long time and he lost all the parts. the rest are of the legs.

Posted on 15 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here