Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 186.37996%

Sonic differences between various Dynasonics? Last viewed: 43 minutes ago

Loading...

Thanks again, guys. This is very interesting. I am happy to hear that the Big Rs are basically the same as the much more expensive earlier versions. I thought that perhaps the earlier ones were quite different beasts, thus the increase in price.

I am kind of surprised by my Dynasonic, very pleasantly so. I don't think I can ever afford a wood Dyna, but I'd sure love to try one, someday.

/Magnus

Posted on 10 years ago
#11
Loading...

It`s all in the "ear of the beholder" so to speak..., but any dyna- be it wood or cob,5x14 or 6.5x14, 1961-67-7 liners,5-liners or the Big R series dyna are all fantastic snares.They were made extemely well in all those time periods.The 6.5`s are naturaly deeper in tone and the 5`s are very versatile and funky beyond belief and there-in lies the beauty of the dynasonic snare drum.Obviously the wood dynas carry that famous warm woody sound Rogers were known for and the quality and craftmanship was top shelf thro` all those time frames of production, be it wood or metal.Enjoy your Big R dyna Magnus N as you know how she sounds and hard to bring out your other snares in the rotation as a result.They are addicting...

Wayne

1967 Rogers Cleveland Champagne Sparkle
20,16,13,13.
1967/68 Rogers Dayton Champagne Sparkle
20,16,13,13.
1966 Rogers cob 7 Line Dynasonic Snare.
1967 Rogers "Humberto Morales" Timbales.
1980 Ludwig B/O badge 14x 6.5 Black Beauty Snare.
1980 Ludwig B/O badge Red Cortex
22,22,18,16,15,14,13.
1988 Sonor "Horst Link" HLD 590 14x8 Bronze Snare
Posted on 10 years ago
#12
Loading...

Thanks, Wayne. As you say, this is a truly addictive snare drum.

/Magnus

Posted on 10 years ago
#13
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here