Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 183.57411%

Sorry - another supraphonic question! Last viewed: 51 minutes ago

Loading...

Greetings! I just got a 1969 supraphonic in amazing condition. I know this question has been asked a million times, but I'm trying to figure out if this is COB or not. I've researched this and it seems like, based on the year, it should be Ludalloy, but a little bit has flaked off inside and it really looks like a brass color. Anyone have an idea?

It's a 14 x 6.5, keystone badge with 1969 serial number. Magnet does not stick to shell, but does stick to rims and muffler knob. There is very little pitting, but it seems to be coming off when i polish it with simachrome.

Here are some pics. Thanks!

2 attachments
Posted on 14 years ago
#1
Posts: 5176 Threads: 188
Loading...

Yes, you're correct...This question gets asked a lot...so much, in fact, a fellow forum member started this thread to which people could refer:

http://www.vintagedrumforum.com/showthread.php?t=9441

Nice looking drum!

"God is dead." -Nietzsche

"Nietzsche is dead." -God
Posted on 14 years ago
#2
Loading...

Top rim looks wrong.........it's rounded where the t rods pass thru.....(ears)

bottom hoop looks more squared off,as it should....................

"Always make sure your front bottom BD lugs clear the ground!"
Posted on 14 years ago
#3
Guest
Loading...

p(drum is brass) < 0.00001

p(magnet sticks to ludalloy snare) = 0.0

p(magnet sticks to steel) = 1.0

p(magnet is any use as diagnostic tool) = 0.0

Posted on 14 years ago
#4
Loading...

From dukeofearl

Greetings! I just got a 1969 supraphonic in amazing condition. I know this question has been asked a million times, but I'm trying to figure out if this is COB or not. I've researched this and it seems like, based on the year, it should be Ludalloy, but a little bit has flaked off inside and it really looks like a brass color. Anyone have an idea? It's a 14 x 6.5, keystone badge with 1969 serial number. Magnet does not stick to shell, but does stick to rims and muffler knob. There is very little pitting, but it seems to be coming off when i polish it with simachrome. Here are some pics. Thanks!

1. does it weigh about 8lbs. +/-?

2. does it have crimped snare beds?

3. badge has no serial #...correct?

Mike Curotto

Posted on 14 years ago
#5
Loading...

It may not look like it,but the two rims are identical, aside from the hole for the snare wires obviously.

It does have a serial number, which is how I could date it to 1969. If crimped snare beds are what i think they are, then these ones are not crimped. I have two scales that are not very precise, one says 7 pounds, one says 8. Everything points to this being a Ludalloy snare, as far as the date and everything, but I was confused because people say to scratch and look under the finish when in doubt, and this looks like brass (or maybe copper) under the finish where it has flaked inside.

Posted on 14 years ago
#6
Guest
Loading...

Are you aware that plating is done in stages (a series of thin coats) using different metals, and a layer of copper or nickel might be put down on the bare aluminum (ludalloy) prior to the chrome layer to help it stick? That helped but didn't stop all the pitting and peeling. Pity.

Quoted post

Formerly most decorative items affixed to cars were referred to as "chrome", by which phrase was actually meant steel that had undergone several plating processes to endure the temperature changes and weather that a car was subject to outdoors. The most expensive and durable process involved plating the steel first with copper, and then nickel, before the chromium plating was applied.

Have you read the link which O-lugs posted? Mlvibes deals with the issue of "pre plating" and the copper color you see. You need to read past the first page of that thread.

Posted on 14 years ago
#7
Loading...

The plating process is easier to understand from the automotive perspective. Whether you start with bare steel or buffed copper, at least two layers of plating follow -- a layer of nickel and a layer of chrome. But high quality plating requires either very thick nickel or a minimum of two layers of nickel.

To achieve highly durable automotive chrome plating suitable for outdoor exposure it's important that it have at least two layers of nickel plating before the chrome, namely semi-bright nickel followed by bright nickel. The reason for this involves galvanic corrosion issues. The bright nickel is anodic to the semi-bright nickel, and sacrificially protects it, spreading the corrosion forces laterally instead of allowing them to penetrate through to the steel.

Since the drum isn't exposed to the extremes of outdoor weather exposure I think it's a fairly safe bet the drums were simply single dipped in Ni prior to Cr.

Although the opacity of the head makes it difficult to determine what actually is exposed, it doesn't look like copper plating bleeding through to me - in a different picture I may have a different opinion.

Posted on 14 years ago
#8
Guest
Loading...

I did give an automotive example, 'tis true. But putting chrome on aluminum successfully also calls for intermediate coatings. Not because we play drums in the snow a lot x-mas3, but because it is very hard to get chrome to stick to aluminum long term. Hence all the de-plating problems of peeling, pitting, and so on all these years later. The fact that the inside of that 1969 Supra is peeling is probably a hint just on its own.

So you think we are seeing Ni Hoppy?

Disclaimer: I'm not a metallurgist, but I have some familiarity with scientific methods in general. So I defer to anybody who has lots of hands on experience with plating. I learned about the use of a brass or copper layer from talking to some specialist (expensive!) re-plating people locally. They don't have any specific Ludwig information, but they know plating with different metals (and the difficult interactions thereof).

Posted on 14 years ago
#9
Loading...

Looks like some kind of oxidation to me rather than an intermediate coat of copper... I can imagine the chrome disappearing because it is such a thin coat (like in the millionths of an inch thick coat), but I would expect to see Ni before Cu. Without a better image it's tough to tell.

Posted on 14 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here