Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 183.17328%

When Did 1920s Ludwig Metal Shells Change? Last viewed: 6 hours ago

Posts: 392 Threads: 30
Loading...

It seems to me that there is not a real clear point of departure on the early Ludwig metal shell snares as to when they got thicker (please point me toward this info if it is available). So let me offer my theory.

While going over the early Ludwig snare catalogs on Vintage Drum Guide I noticed that in the1923 catalog they had gone to engraving the Ludwig logo on the shell instead of on the hoop as they did previously. It is my thought that if the shells got thicker at that time it was just to accommodate the engraving that was happening then (some models were elaborately engraved. If as some folks suggest, the slight thickening of the shell influences the sound, then would the elaborate etching and such effect it too?). They also started adding a little more width to the hoop (I don’t mean gauge thickness) so they could add the new flange to the bottom of the hoops, and made them from a rust proof metal then too (are those rust proof hoops brass? What is heavier steel or brass). These two changes (shell thickness and extra flange material) would of course add to the weight. So when Ludwig changed shell thickness were they consistent in maintaining that new gauge? Anybody know the various gauges of those snares, say up to 1932?

Also I noticed, as they developed new snares Ludwig appears to have maintained their best models in their catalog throughout the early years by renaming them. As an example the top of the line snare in 1924 (Top of the line to me in this instance doesn’t include the fancy engraving on the same drum) had the new strainer for that year, and the model that was the top of the line in 1923, is moved to a lower spot in their line. The hoop mount style strainer is back in 1924 on the “Universal” metal shell model. So it seems that as Ludwig came out with new features on their metal snares they relegated the older style models to what can appear to be lesser quality models but these seem to have been the best in their day. To you collectors, does this seem to be the way you see it? Am I on the right track here?

“In fact your pedal extremities are a bit obnoxious”. – Fats Waller
Posted on 15 years ago
#1
Loading...

It seems to me that there is not a real clear point of departure on the early Ludwig metal shell snares as to when they got thicker (please point me toward this info if it is available). So let me offer my theory. While going over the early Ludwig snare catalogs on Vintage Drum Guide I noticed that in the1923 catalog they had gone to engraving the Ludwig logo on the shell instead of on the hoop as they did previously. It is my thought that if the shells got thicker at that time it was just to accommodate the engraving that was happening then (some models were elaborately engraved. If as some folks suggest, the slight thickening of the shell influences the sound, then would the elaborate etching and such effect it too?). They also started adding a little more width to the hoop (I don’t mean gauge thickness) so they could add the new flange to the bottom of the hoops, and made them from a rust proof metal then too (are those rust proof hoops brass? What is heavier steel or brass). These two changes (shell thickness and extra flange material) would of course add to the weight. So when Ludwig changed shell thickness were they consistent in maintaining that new gauge? Anybody know the various gauges of those snares, say up to 1932?Also I noticed, as they developed new snares Ludwig appears to have maintained their best models in their catalog throughout the early years by renaming them. As an example the top of the line snare in 1924 (Top of the line to me in this instance doesn’t include the fancy engraving on the same drum) had the new strainer for that year, and the model that was the top of the line in 1923, is moved to a lower spot in their line. The hoop mount style strainer is back in 1924 on the “Universal” metal shell model. So it seems that as Ludwig came out with new features on their metal snares they relegated the older style models to what can appear to be lesser quality models but these seem to have been the best in their day. To you collectors, does this seem to be the way you see it? Am I on the right track here?

from my experience, the universal pioneer that i had, the shell was not as thick as my 10 lug brass shell, since the 8 lug model for 1923 is the same as my 10 lug model, from 1922-1923 was the year the shell was drastically changed,as with the model evolution,in manufacturing that's the process,just as you used the pioneer analogy thats what happend with the snare drum, remember it was still evolving at this time, and Mr Ludwig could market a producet so the name pioneer for a snare drum?? perfect, all i know of the old brass drums orchestrial drummers always go after the 10 lug models, not the 6 lug models!Violin

Your drummers not much good is he!? What you need is someone that's as good as me. ! John Henry Bonham !!
Posted on 15 years ago
#2
Loading...

Just a couple of thoughts.......

You are dealing with two different brass shell Ludwigs during that era......

The pioneer had a lighter weight shell, typical bearing edges for brass shell snares of that era, and the rim usually had the Ludwig oval stamped on it. This drum was 6 or 8 lugs. Mostly seen in a 5x14, I have seen an occasional 6.5x14. It also had banded steel hoops. The Pioneer was not considered to be a professional model (more of a student model) and was produced well into the 30's and perhaps beyond.

The Standard, was the heavier, two piece brass shell, had the bell shaped bearing edges that are soldered back in to the shell (one of the factors that help create their marvelous sound) and had the ludwig script logo stamped on the shell. It also had single flange hoops. I have seen a few rare versions with the script logo engraved on the shell. The Standard type shell actually offered a 6 lug version earlier in the 20's, and also offered the 8 and 10 lug models as well as the decade progressed. You will see some of the early 20's heavy brass shells (6 lugs) with the hoop mounted strainer. IMHO, 8 lug versions are the most desirable among most collectors, but 10 lugs ain't bad either.

The Standard was available in 4x14, 5x14, 6.5x14 (and the same depths in 15"). It was also offered as a Super Sensitive model. The Standard shell was the same shell used for Black Beauties.

Here's a 20's 8 lug Standard with all the features mentioned above.... This one's a bit unusual as it has black nickel plated hoops and the script logo is engraved (as opposed to the usual stamped logo).

[IMG]http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll197/Luxor65/LL4-1.jpg[/IMG]

Posted on 15 years ago
#3
Posts: 392 Threads: 30
Loading...

Thank you for your imput!

So were the early 6 luggers models better than later model 6 luggers? They appear to have had the same shell thickness etc. as the later 8 lug Pioneers (I think later on the Universals were 6 lugs but with a hoop mount strainer from an earlier year)? Can anybody offer the gauge differences in those old shells, maybe up to 1932 (or whatever you have), so we can know precisely. Many of the questions in my first post are not being answered. But I do think that what has been presented does indicate that the best drums in one year could be maintained as a more inexpensive model in a following year. The soldering of the bearing edge fold-back is important I totally agree! As is the change in thickness that wasn’t that much, and as I said seems to correspond with the timing of engraving the shells. What is the evidence that a later 8 lug Pioneer is not the same quality drum as the 6 lug 1918 models or is the 8 lug Pioneer only better because it has the added tuning ability. So did the best model in an earlier year become a student model in "name only"? If so then if you wanted a 1918 6 lug model you could get a bargain on a 6 lug Pioneer or whatever. Of course I’m looking for the essential difference and it dosen’t seem to be that obvious is all I'm saying.

Thanks for getting in on this you guys!!! I truly am looking for the change timelines!

Clapping Happy2

“In fact your pedal extremities are a bit obnoxious”. – Fats Waller
Posted on 15 years ago
#4
Posts: 392 Threads: 30
Loading...

From Powertone

Just a couple of thoughts.......You are dealing with two different brass shell Ludwigs during that era......The pioneer had a lighter weight shell, typical bearing edges for brass shell snares of that era, and the rim usually had the Ludwig oval stamped on it. This drum was 6 or 8 lugs. Mostly seen in a 5x14, I have seen an occasional 6.5x14. It also had banded steel hoops. The Pioneer was not considered to be a professional model (more of a student model) and was produced well into the 30's and perhaps beyond. The Standard, was the heavier, two piece brass shell, had the bell shaped bearing edges that are soldered back in to the shell (one of the factors that help create their marvelous sound) and had the ludwig script logo stamped on the shell. It also had single flange hoops. I have seen a few rare versions with the script logo engraved on the shell. The Standard type shell actually offered a 6 lug version earlier in the 20's, and also offered the 8 and 10 lug models as well as the decade progressed. You will see some of the early 20's heavy brass shells (6 lugs) with the hoop mounted strainer. IMHO, 8 lug versions are the most desirable among most collectors, but 10 lugs ain't bad either. The Standard was available in 4x14, 5x14, 6.5x14 (and the same depths in 15"). It was also offered as a Super Sensitive model. The Standard shell was the same shell used for Black Beauties.Here's a 20's 8 lug Standard with all the features mentioned above.... This one's a bit unusual as it has black nickel plated hoops and the script logo is engraved (as opposed to the usual stamped logo).[IMG]http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll197/Luxor65/LL4-1.jpg[/IMG]

Powertone - Do you know what years and models they were stamping the logo and when/what model they engraved the logo? It seems odd to me that Ludwig would stamp their finest drums when they could have engraved them, so were they engraving their top models for a period of time and then stamping that model during a later period of time? Or, were they stamping and engraving the logo on the shells in the same period?

Thanks Powertone!!!

Thanks for the great photo too! A great drum!

“In fact your pedal extremities are a bit obnoxious”. – Fats Waller
Posted on 15 years ago
#5
Loading...

[QUOTE=Powertone;60570]Just a couple of thoughts.......

You are dealing with two different brass shell Ludwigs during that era......

The pioneer had a lighter weight shell, typical bearing edges for brass shell snares of that era, and the rim usually had the Ludwig oval stamped on it. This drum was 6 or 8 lugs. Mostly seen in a 5x14, I have seen an occasional 6.5x14. It also had banded steel hoops. The Pioneer was not considered to be a professional model (more of a student model) and was produced well into the 30's and perhaps beyond.

The Standard, was the heavier, two piece brass shell, had the bell shaped bearing edges that are soldered back in to the shell (one of the factors that help create their marvelous sound) and had the ludwig script logo stamped on the shell. It also had single flange hoops. I have seen a few rare versions with the script logo engraved on the shell. The Standard type shell actually offered a 6 lug version earlier in the 20's, and also offered the 8 and 10 lug models as well as the decade progressed. You will see some of the early 20's heavy brass shells (6 lugs) with the hoop mounted strainer. IMHO, 8 lug versions are the most desirable among most collectors, but 10 lugs ain't bad either.

The Standard was available in 4x14, 5x14, 6.5x14 (and the same depths in 15"). It was also offered as a Super Sensitive model. The Standard shell was the same shell used for Black Beauties.

Here's a 20's 8 lug Standard with all the features mentioned above.... This one's a bit unusual as it has black nickel plated hoops and the script logo is engraved (as opposed to the usual stamped logo).

[IMG]http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll197/Luxor65/LL4-1.jpg[/IMG]QUOTE]powertone thanks for the imput, man that is a cool looking snare drum, thanks for showing it to us!!Clapping Happy2

Your drummers not much good is he!? What you need is someone that's as good as me. ! John Henry Bonham !!
Posted on 15 years ago
#6
Posts: 392 Threads: 30
Loading...

From vintagemore2000

from my experience, the universal pioneer that i had, the shell was not as thick as my 10 lug brass shell, since the 8 lug model for 1923 is the same as my 10 lug model, from 1922-1923 was the year the shell was drastically changed,as with the model evolution,in manufacturing that's the process,just as you used the pioneer analogy thats what happend with the snare drum, remember it was still evolving at this time, and Mr Ludwig could market a producet so the name pioneer for a snare drum?? perfect, all i know of the old brass drums orchestrial drummers always go after the 10 lug models, not the 6 lug models!Violin

vintagemore2000 - You mentioned "drastically changed". Details about this change (when, what, how long, what models etc.) is exactly what I’m looking for and this info seems to be mentioned in very vague ways these days. Could you point me towards a source of the specific details I’ve mentioned (gauge differences, manufacturing changes and such, for those early years), because Ludwig never mentioned many of those subtle changes back then and every year referred to their top models as the best.

Can you point me to the 1920 to1922 snare catalogs, because although there is no mention of a 10 lug 14” snare (like the one you mention) in the 1923 catalog, the 1924 D snare catalog mentions that you could order 10 lugs on a 14” for an extra cost (10 lug 15”ers had already been available). Was your 10 lugger offered as a special order in 1922? I’m missing the info from precisely the years you mention, except for 1923. I am having a hard time finding the transition time info of 1922 you mention. Did they start engraving the shell logo in 1922? I sure wish you and I and the rest, could flesh this info out in detail.

Thanks again!

“In fact your pedal extremities are a bit obnoxious”. – Fats Waller
Posted on 15 years ago
#7
Loading...

Re engraved vs stamped....... The normal script logo on the shell, located next to the strainer on 8 lug drums, and one panel over from the strainer on ten lug drums, was stamped into the shell. I have seen one or two drums were it was actually engraved. This was a one off thing, not a regular feature that happened on a timeline.

I don't know exactly when they began stamping the logo on the heavy brass two piece shells. I assume around the time they started using the pioneer strainer.

There were essentially two brass shells going on simultaneously.

Posted on 15 years ago
#8
Posts: 392 Threads: 30
Loading...

O.K. I’ve found a mention of the “Hard Spun” 18 gauge stock used for the metal shells in 1918 & 1919. So that is a starting point on the weight of the metal shells with the rib around the center of it. They also note that it is the “strongest shell for its weight ever constructed”. That implies to me that there were heavier drums out there at the time and Ludwig was promoting that they made it light (not that it was the lightest they ever made in that stye). Is this the heavy gauge shell or should we expect that the later shells of, say 1923 were a thicker gauge (16 or 14 etc.) than these early ribbed shells?

Here is the link to the 1918 catalog page that mentions the shell thickness:

http://www.vintagedrumguide.com/images/ludwig_snaredrums/1918-ludwig-snare-drums-3.jpg

Here is another catalog page from 1927 where Ludwig mentions the weight of the Professional 5 x 14 model, again promoting its lightness:

http://www.vintagedrumguide.com/images/ludwig_snaredrums/1927_ludwig_snaredrums6.jpg

“In fact your pedal extremities are a bit obnoxious”. – Fats Waller
Posted on 15 years ago
#9
Posts: 392 Threads: 30
Loading...

From Powertone

Re engraved vs stamped....... The normal script logo on the shell, located next to the strainer on 8 lug drums, and one panel over from the strainer on ten lug drums, was stamped into the shell. I have seen one or two drums were it was actually engraved. This was a one off thing, not a regular feature that happened on a timeline.I don't know exactly when they began stamping the logo on the heavy brass two piece shells. I assume around the time they started using the pioneer strainer.There were essentially two brass shells going on simultaneously.

Powertone - Thanks for your input! I was wondering about that logo placement, and you cleared that up for me.:)

Do you know if the simultaneous production of the two different shells you mentioned were before 1923 or after that? Did they only stamp the logo on heavier shells or did they stamp both weights? It seem like there are a few different logo styles too. I guess they changed it a little over those early years.

“In fact your pedal extremities are a bit obnoxious”. – Fats Waller
Posted on 15 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here