Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 185.57829%

Another 'oddball' Ludwig Standard Last viewed: 10 hours ago

Loading...

While cruising eBay this morning, I noticed something different. A few weeks ago, can't remember how many, I bookmarked this Standard kit that is being offered on eBay. Not because I was interested in it, I often 'watch' items that interest me in general. I'd never really paid much attention to these before, but this morning I had a notice in my email that the item was ending, so I clicked the link to have a look. That's when I noticed 'the difference'.

First, standard 'fishy' disclaimer: I don't own or have any interest in these. I don't know who owns them, and I am not promoting the owners offer to sell these drums in any way. In fact, I REALLY have no interest in these. If you feel you have to own them, grab 'em!

The kit is a 20, 12, 16. It's had the bass drum post changed to a 'Rocker' style at some time in the past... the cymbal mount on the bass indicates the bass drum had been originally designated as part of a single rack tom kit. So, except for the post, it looks quite original...

Look at the spurs.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=151415618516&ssPageName=ADME:B:WNA:US:3160

Those are Ludwig Classic spur mounts and fold in spurs... on a Standard kit. I can not see any extra holes in the bass drum shell, so I assume the mounts are original.

Just another weird anomaly in the saga of Ludwig Standard's.

The link above will disappear eventually. Photo's provided below for posterity.

fishwaltz
Posted on 10 years ago
#1
Loading...

More Pictures:

fishwaltz
Posted on 10 years ago
#2
Posts: 2010 Threads: 19
Loading...

Spurs were a special order perhaps?

20/12/16 is a bit of a weird combo as far as how it came to be. They sold 13/16/22 & 12/13/16/22 & 12/14/20 but not a 12 & 20 with a 16". Could have been special ordered or the 16" is an add on. I guess we'll never know but looks to be a cool set.

Posted on 10 years ago
#3
Loading...

Fish - Ludwig started using that Granitone paint on Standards in 1968. Because it was the low-end kit in the catalogs some of those early kits may have sported the old fold-out legs to economize on hardware. So strange, those Standard kits all used the same shells as any of the high end kits, yet they are so cheap when compared to their counter-parts. I think that part of the reason why Standards sound so good is precisely because they used lighter/cheaper lugs and hardware. The fold-out legs may have been left-over stock and they just put them on the early Standard kits until the stock was gone. Just a guess, but it makes sense.

Sweet kit.

John

Too many great drums to list here!

http://www.walbergandauge.com/VintageVenue.htm
Posted on 10 years ago
#4
Posts: 510 Threads: 193
Loading...

Yep, can't beat the bang for the buck you get with Standards vs. any other drums from that period.

70s Slingy WMP
70s Ludwig Standard Aqua Mist
60s Ludwig Champagne Sparkle Downbeat
and a whole bunch of snares and hardware
Posted on 10 years ago
#5
Posts: 2753 Threads: 132
Loading...

I have had a foul taste in my mouth for Ludwig drums ever since I was forced to play a new set furnished by Ludwig for a battle of the bands in Chicago in 1967. That drum set was terrible. The tom holders would not hold position, the bass drum spurs kept collapsing, and a few other factors made for a horrible experience. I have not owned any Ludwig drums until a few years ago when I picked up a Black Sparkle Acrolite snare drum for $35. It's a good sounding drum. I traded a set of drums for a set of Ruby Strata Standards (20-12-14-matching snare). They are terrific drums except for the lugs that are very pimply. I keep my eyes open for a bargain priced group of regular Ludwig lugs for the entire drum set. I don't think that I'll ever want any Ludwig top line drum sets vintage or new.

No matter how far you push the envelope, it is still stationery.
Posted on 10 years ago
#6
Loading...

From K.O.

Spurs were a special order perhaps?20/12/16 is a bit of a weird combo as far as how it came to be. They sold 13/16/22 & 12/13/16/22 & 12/14/20 but not a 12 & 20 with a 16". Could have been special ordered or the 16" is an add on. I guess we'll never know but looks to be a cool set.

Yep. From what I understand, you could order about anything you wanted as far as swapping drums around - just like the Classic's. If it was me, I would have gotten a 13, 16 but that's now, now then. twelve inch rack toms were pretty much the standard at that time. Sure, there were lots of 13's, but in a one up, one down configuration twelve was still 'it'. Although that wouldn't last much longer.

Just as an aside: When many kits were purchased with two rack toms in the early to mid sixties, and maybe fifties (not so sure about that) you got two 12" rack toms. Especially in the days of rail mounts.

fishwaltz
Posted on 10 years ago
#7
Loading...

From Purdie Shuffle

Fish - Ludwig started using that Granitone paint on Standards in 1968. Because it was the low-end kit in the catalogs some of those early kits may have sported the old fold-out legs to economize on hardware. So strange, those Standard kits all used the same shells as any of the high end kits, yet they are so cheap when compared to their counter-parts. I think that part of the reason why Standards sound so good is precisely because they used lighter/cheaper lugs and hardware. The fold-out legs may have been left-over stock and they just put them on the early Standard kits until the stock was gone. Just a guess, but it makes sense.Sweet kit.John

Hi John

How ya been? I'm thinking just like you. The shells were exactly the same. In fact, some of my 'Standard' drums have the white, not granitone interiors. I figure Ludwig needed a 20" bass to complete the order, and grabbed one off the line. The odd thing - thinking about it now - is that it prob would have had a white interior. Maybe the original owner ordered it with those spurs. It's impossible to tell. Your assumption about weird parts (and interiors) on Standard kits is exactly right. A good friend told me he'd seen a Standard kit with a rail mount, and no extra holes for a post.

Weird stuff happened in those days at the Ludwig plant.

fishwaltz
Posted on 10 years ago
#8
Loading...

From leedybdp

I have had a foul taste in my mouth for Ludwig drums ever since i was forced to play a new set furnished by Ludwig for a battle of the bands in Chicago in 1967. That drum set was terrible. The tom holders would not hold position, the bass drum spurs kept collapsing, and a few other factors made for a horrible experience. I have not owned any Ludwig drums until a few years ago when I picked up a Black Sparkle Acrolite snare drum for $35. It's a good sounding drum. I traded a set of drums for a set of Rby Strata Standards (20-12-14-matching snare). They are terrific drums except for the lugs that are very pimply. I keep my eyes open for a bargain priced group of regular Ludwig lugs for the entire drum set. I don't think that I'll ever want any Ludwig top line drum sets vintage or new.

There's been a thread or two about that very thing - changing out the light duty lugs for classic's. I've never heard a set like that, but I would imagine it would sound very, very close to a regular Ludwig kit of that era.

I REALLY like Acrolite's. I've got a bunch, and include them in my snare rotation.

Those Ruby's look sweet! Did you change the post mount on the bass? It looks like a normal Ludwig Classic mount.

fishwaltz
Posted on 10 years ago
#9
Posts: 2753 Threads: 132
Loading...

From fishwaltz

Yep. From what I understand, you could order about anything you wanted as far as swapping drums around - just like the Classic's. If it was me, I would have gotten a 13, 16 but that's now, now then. twelve inch rack toms were pretty much the standard at that time. Sure, there were lots of 13's, but in a one up, one down configuration twelve was still 'it'. Although that wouldn't last much longer. Just as an aside: When many kits were purchased with two rack toms in the early to mid sixties, and maybe fifties (not so sure about that) you got two 12" rack toms. Especially in the days of rail mounts.

In the 60s, two 8x12 toms were very common with 20" and 22" bass drums and either 14x14" for the 20" bass drum or 16x16" for the 22" bass drums. I had a few Slingerland and Camco sets with two 8x12 toms.

No matter how far you push the envelope, it is still stationery.
Posted on 10 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here