Arguments ? Some all in good fun razzing is now arguments?...Jeez....Well, I for one, do consider Steve/Dolfan to be the worlds foremost expert on both Geo Way And early Camco drums. My question is, how many Oaklawn era Camco/Jasper shelled 24s w/o re-rings would we need to see before they would no longer be considered a prototype?
Original? Prototype? Why only 24" bass drums?
I have seen enough to consider them original especially since we now have dates pinning them to the tail end of Oaklawn. I had a hard time believing they would just randomly make a bass drum w/o re-rings unless they actually ran out of material.
The prototype name may apply here but why only 24" bass drums? When making a drum is it harder to build a 24" shell w/o re-rings or a 12" shell? I don't make drums so I'm asking a serious question that I do not know the answer to. I would think for a true prototype that they would've built an entire kit w/o rings. Could it be that they decided re-rings were not necessary in 24" bass drums? There are just so many questions that go unanswered IMO.
I've said in the past that I'm not quick to jump to conclusions and I'm sorry if that offends anyone. But in the past I have jumped to conclusions as soon as I saw something odd. Which usually ended up proving me wrong.
I'm not perfect by any means and I don't consider myself an expert either. That name should go to JoLo, a man that knows the ins and outs of Camco better than anyone I know. I learn so much from him.
One last thing. I often use the phrase "I've never seen that before". Please don't assume that I'm saying it doesn't exist or isn't original. I'm simply saying that I've never seen that before.