Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 183.77453%

drum grading Last viewed: 2 hours ago

Posts: 5550 Threads: 576
Loading...

it has come to my attention lately that there is a grave concern on condition of drums, as to museum, verses restored ,and player ,to total salvage, drums out here, so, I think i know a museum drum from a salvage drum but for the sake of others there should be a grading system like with coins and a certificate out here i think i can grade a drum after all theses years of seeing them,i really don't think there could ever be a 10 , as to the aging process especially with pigments as they break down by shifting and degrading of color with time being the enemy,as a set i saw on a 1962 movie the other night, a blue oyster super classic Ludwig the color so beautiful will never ever be as brilliant as day 1 , that being said i think the highest a drum could be if museum quality would b a 9

...so perfect drums do not exist, no matter how much one could hope for that, certs for drums would be nice....gary

April 2nd 1969 scarfed pink champagne holly wood and 65/66 downbeat snare, and , supra same year very minty kit old pies
66/67 downbeat with canister
Super 400 small round knob
1967 super classic obp





once the brass ceases to glitter, and the drum looses its luster, and the stage remains dark, all you have left is the timbre of family.
Posted on 10 years ago
#1
Loading...

Good point jaghog.I`m sure professional collectors and pickers have some kind of grading system in place,but as you said,there is no clear cut system for the drum guys". But to have a system like the other collecting fields have, would certainly be a bonus to the world of drum collecting.Agreed...no such thing as a 10.

Wayne

1967 Rogers Cleveland Champagne Sparkle
20,16,13,13.
1967/68 Rogers Dayton Champagne Sparkle
20,16,13,13.
1966 Rogers cob 7 Line Dynasonic Snare.
1967 Rogers "Humberto Morales" Timbales.
1980 Ludwig B/O badge 14x 6.5 Black Beauty Snare.
1980 Ludwig B/O badge Red Cortex
22,22,18,16,15,14,13.
1988 Sonor "Horst Link" HLD 590 14x8 Bronze Snare
Posted on 10 years ago
#2
Loading...

I think 10 is just a more natural number to use to designate those kits that show the absolute very least signs of aging. The rarest of the rare. "All things considered" being part of the scale from bottom to top...

Another wrinkle is, certain wood finishes might actually look better with age...to certain people...like me :0

Mitch

Posted on 10 years ago
#3
Posts: 351 Threads: 22
Loading...

There are vintage drums to be marked as 10.

N.O.S.

Generally it's good idea to make a kind of "official" grading with selection what issues make each grade.

---------------------
In case of deal with johnnyringo:
http://www.vintagedrumforum.com/show...80&postcount=1
Posted on 10 years ago
#4
Posts: 5550 Threads: 576
Loading...

From snurf

There are vintage drums to be marked as 10.N.O.S.Generally it's good idea to make a kind of "official" grading with selection what issues make each grade.

I am not saying a nos drum is not up on scale, but no matter how perfect its stored, most pigments do break down, natural degrading its a process that colorist have been battling for years its unavoidable, it is not just uv or climate, its the natural break down and disintegration of the pigments the colors shift and actually change hues, so there is no perfect as the day it was made drum out here as in vintage, new is another story, as a colorist that's been my battle in historic restoration, its really earthen pigments that are mined, and as such, slowly revert back to the ore that they were mined from some of the weakest pigments are blue, green, yellows , and some of the stronger ones are browns, reds (not all) the issue with white and black, are its clear coat's they fade and yellows them out from usually uv and the natural yellowing of the nitrous cellulose lacquer used (side bar they usually can be sanded out and re-cleared to remove most of the yellowing and all whites lean to one of the 3 primary colors), anyway so there you are .... no 10's 9.5's would be nos ....

April 2nd 1969 scarfed pink champagne holly wood and 65/66 downbeat snare, and , supra same year very minty kit old pies
66/67 downbeat with canister
Super 400 small round knob
1967 super classic obp





once the brass ceases to glitter, and the drum looses its luster, and the stage remains dark, all you have left is the timbre of family.
Posted on 10 years ago
#5
Loading...

I like the idea of a consistent grading system as a guide for all. In my mind, a brand-new drum, factory boxed and wrapped with unbroken tape would be a 10. A NOS drum in this shape would qualify as a 10 in my mind, unless the wrap showed fade as Gary suggested. I've not had the experience of comparing an unopened, uncirculated NOS drum with brand new to determine if any deterioration occurred.

Hugh

1966 Rogers Holidays 8x12, 9x13, 16x16, 14x20, 14x22, with matching 5x14 Powertone in BDP
1967 Rogers Dynasonic in COB
Posted on 10 years ago
#6
Posts: 977 Threads: 124
Loading...

Splitting components {wrap, hardware, bearing edges} is the best way to begin noting condition.

MINT = as issued w/ zero flaws of any kind (as if purchased new back in the day);

MUSEUM = MINT but = something quantifiably more : say, rare wraps, certain iconic drummers equipment, etc;

SHOWROOM or COLLECTOR GRADE = is not necessarily MINT, but is close enough for a cigar & most collectors will pay whatever it takes to snag it.

EVERYTHING ELSE (accordingly described)

When selling clear photos should without a doubt accompany a decent attempt at penning the overall assessment of condition. Without these it's a matter of taking a seller's word that such & such is X quality ... which is not how I like to do business.

Any of the above should not to be expected from the neophyte or any seller who considers a drumstick something to be requested on holidays. This is when specific questions & answers should flow to and fro.

In town nothing ever comes up on CL so my only venue for buying is ebay. Over the summer I've bought a few "MINT," "SHOWROOM" pieces that were not either of these. When sellers use these words they are either wholly ignorant when it comes to the proper use of the English language &/or a little bit wicked and they know what they're doing.

EVEN IF certain of the above descriptor words are employed it's ALWAYS a good idea to confirm by asking specific questions. If offense is taken take that as a gift as it's usually a signal that something's not quite right with item X &/or the seller. Any seller worth his salt will take the time to reassure without getting testy about your questions ... especially when a premium has been placed on item X. {&, no, this is not directed in any way at VDF member.}

This saves both seller & buyer the hassle of misunderstanding one another.

Chris

Posted on 10 years ago
#7
Loading...

Hobbs: like your stab at it. Would especially like to see pics of that Rogers Dyna after detailing done.

Hugh

1966 Rogers Holidays 8x12, 9x13, 16x16, 14x20, 14x22, with matching 5x14 Powertone in BDP
1967 Rogers Dynasonic in COB
Posted on 10 years ago
#8
Posts: 5550 Threads: 576
Loading...

picture are the key to define quality, poor pics lack definition, and some pics do not lend credence to the drum, but some people words are good enough for me as in some experts here, some so called pros are only going on to gather inventory buy low to sell high as in most here do myself included, but I agree presentation is everything, but also know most deals are accurately describe from a sellers knowledge of what he or she has and may be has a limited knowledge of collector drums ,I don't blame some high end sellers here to doubt the merchandise and I too have been burnt by the so called word of a amateur but lets face it most of us geezers here were around when some of the drums we covet, were brand new, and now we see there aging and know the difference while others of a younger gen don't quite understand whats up and do not know the difference or don't care, selling mediocre goods are pretty much whats out here and very few drums are of very high collector quality, I personally don't no ever will sell a drum with out a fair and rigorous grade, going from my experience, I know whats up with 50's/60's Ludwig (some earlier stuff too) when I sell something I accurately grade the item as to flaws in and out of drum, but who makes any one here a grading expert I think only a very few of us here would qualify ...

April 2nd 1969 scarfed pink champagne holly wood and 65/66 downbeat snare, and , supra same year very minty kit old pies
66/67 downbeat with canister
Super 400 small round knob
1967 super classic obp





once the brass ceases to glitter, and the drum looses its luster, and the stage remains dark, all you have left is the timbre of family.
Posted on 10 years ago
#9
Loading...

I think shipping degrades drums faster than anything.

I've bought a lot of 10s online that show up on my porch as 7s.

Posted on 10 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here