Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 184.57620%

Lets discuss the bread and butter lugs Last viewed: 0 seconds ago

Posts: 2628 Threads: 40
Loading...

From Ludwig-dude

Jaye, this is where you and I differ on this point. If I find a B&B lug Rogers, first thing I ask is how much.....if its rediculous, I pass because I know I am already thinking in terms of repro lugs. I wouldn't even consider "doing the deed' as you state. Will I have more into the drum than its currently worth? Probably, but I'd be looking at it from a longterm investment point of view... Its kind of like when you find a Gretsch 3-ply, or a Radio King, or a Leedy bass drum fitted with 80's type Pearl tom mounts, or a Ludwig double tom mount with that GIANT hole drilled in the top of the bass shell Mind Blowi Beavertails fitted to a B&B drum is the same thing as that to me....Like I said, if I was keeoing it longterm, I'd spend the dough on the repros, I personally would be happier in the long run knowing I saved a drum correctly. :DAnd thats my :2Cents:

[COLOR="Purple"]I understand and ..if it's a real SPECIAL old B&B, I can go along with that, really...100%. So I really DO commend you for doing what (if money was no object) would be the obvious and very proper solution.

But converting to B'tails it is absolutely NOT the same thing as drilling a massive Pearl tube-arm mount into a classic shell. Two different things entirely. I don't really think that elongating some mount holes by 1/16" is the equivalent of hacking a 2" diameter hole in a shell....

You know....Rogers folks have been doing the B'tail conversion since B'tails came out. Not all that unusual to run across an old Cleveland shell where someone has done this long, long ago. It's not just a recent thing.

Fact is, regardless of how cool they are (and they ARE cool, the B& B's....especially the 'coffin-style' and 'peanut-style' ones)....they were just a poorly engineered design, period. (Actually, let me correct that - they worked FINE with old calfskin heads....but they just couldn't take the tensions of synthetic heads...so they failed rather miserably). Add to that the fact that modern drummers tend to tension/tune higher than yesteryear, and these just plain don't work anymore.

And while I like Jim Petty...I must say that the fella loves to talk and in talkin' he has told me that he SUBS OUT the production of these to a machinist. Not rocket science to figure out that he probably jacks the retail price WAY up from what he is payin' those guys to make 'em. As mentioned, he literally has cornered the market....nobody has a choice but to pay whatever he decides to charge.

Too bad, because the guy started 'em out at $20/25. If he would just undertsand that if they stayed at that price, more folks would buy 'em and his biz would be just as lucrative...it would be a much more attainable solution for many. Think about it....that'd save someone $60 on a rack tom, $90 on a FT & bass drum. That's a savings of $240 over what one has to shell out these days. It's still pricey, yes....but at least it's "worthy of consideration" pricey. The guy would literally double his orders, I am certain.

But he went for jacking up the pricetags instead....

Also..y'know....not all Rogers kits are collectible...and I disagree that all B&B kits (or single rums for that matter) need 'saving'...and I would even argue that doing the B'tail conversion so you can play the nice old drums...IS 'saving' em.

There are ALWAYS folks looking to snatch up old, uncracked B&B's because theya re trying to 'save' their own project kit...so passing 'em along to a brooother for that purpose isn't anything to frown upon.

I say if even switching out just the batters to the JPetty Repros is still too expensive...you are left with the same 3 options as folks mentioned on page 1 of this thread:

1) leave 'em uncracked, don't play it, and sell it for a profit.

2) Try the cold-weld putty solution

3) Switch 'em to B'tails and either keep or sell the B&B's....

[/COLOR]

www.2ndending.com
Posted on 15 years ago
#31
Loading...

Couple of points from a Rogers collector....

Don't drill to install repros, especially if it is a nice kit in rare sizes and finish.

It is quite possible to track replacements for the more cracked lugs. Even a lightly cracked lug should hold the tension well enough for toms and bass drum tunings. I would repros for snares.

I love the idea of someone remaking an affordable modern version of that lug. It is one of the most beautiful designs and would look great on a modern kit. Why not do it? There are a couple of cusom builders out there doing Slingy beavertail repros and they look fantastic.

Posted on 15 years ago
#32
Posts: 1040 Threads: 106
Loading...

Forgive youngster-why do these lugs crack and how was that being solved when they were new?

Sysl krysu nenahradi!

-196?-72 6ply White Oyster Amati
-1960s 3ply Red Sparkle Amati
- Zildjian, Paiste, Zyn, Istanbul

http://bandzone.cz/blueswan
Posted on 15 years ago
#33
Loading...

When those lugs were originally used, the drum heads were still made from real animal skins. To properly tune them did not require the extreme tension that is required by the new mylar/plastic heads that we use today.

Ya know, I never thought about it until now but... would that be an option? Simply use real calf skin heads for these old Rogers BnB kits.

Posted on 15 years ago
#34
Loading...

You could do what I did to a 9x13 B&B tom. (Now don't you Rogers purist scream) I replaced them with small Ludwig classic lugs. They fit the holes but the drum is confusing to look at.

2 attachments
Posted on 15 years ago
#35
Loading...

C'mon... no way. You mean the common Luddy casing has the same spacing? Why didn't anyone else mention that?

I see that as a great solution for me. I'm not a purist and I'm more interested in the sound of the drums than aesthetics.

Only about half of my BnB lugs are cracked and even those are very very tiny hairline cracks. I'll pull all the BnB lugs and save them for when I sell the kit (if ever) and use the Ludwigs for playing right now.

I can't believe no one else has mentioned this. I remember 1 post a page or 2 back that mentioned a MIJ lug that had the same spacing but..... geeze, Ludwig lugs are a dime a dozen on eBay.

Oh oh..... shhhhhhhhhhh. LOL

Posted on 15 years ago
#36
Loading...

Really????????????????????

Thats great for toms and bass drums, but...what about snares?

-Adam

Posted on 15 years ago
#37
Posts: 6288 Threads: 375
Loading...

From KapperDog

C'mon... no way. You mean the common Luddy casing has the same spacing? Why didn't anyone else mention that?I see that as a great solution for me. I'm not a purist and I'm more interested in the sound of the drums than aesthetics.Only about half of my BnB lugs are cracked and even those are very very tiny hairline cracks. I'll pull all the BnB lugs and save them for when I sell the kit (if ever) and use the Ludwigs for playing right now.I can't believe no one else has mentioned this. I remember 1 post a page or 2 back that mentioned a MIJ lug that had the same spacing but..... geeze, Ludwig lugs are a dime a dozen on eBay.Oh oh..... shhhhhhhhhhh. LOL

Love this site !!

Two days and 20 hours after posting a question.... there's the answer.

Free of charge.......:Santa:

Didn't have to do any research other than ask a question.

Spent no money, just had to exhibit a little patience.

Great site !!

:)

Kevin
Posted on 15 years ago
#38
Loading...

Totally agree Kevin! Thats why I love this site! Its amazing.

Now. Seriously. What about snare drums?

AND...does anyone seriously know someone at a major hardware manufacturer that wants to make a cast version of the B+B for sale worldwide on drum builder sites etc? I am sorry, but the Ludwig casings don't look NEARLY as classy as the B+B casings, and if I had the chance to pick between the two I would go with the B+B every time (even though if I really wanted to play the kit and there were no other options I would do the mini lug thing for SURE!).

-Ad

Posted on 15 years ago
#39
Posts: 3972 Threads: 180
Loading...

This was mentioned months and months ago by a very handsome and amazingly clean gentleman in another thread. I had said that the Luddy lugs fit the Rogers spacing. I thought it would be a scream to replace them with the smooth Standard lugs. But, I was the only one that thought it was funny. I guess humor does require time after all.

The first pic shows the Standard lugs on a beavertail tom. The second shows the reason classic lugs don't fit it (posts are too fat and not spread correctly). The third shows why Standard lugs DO fit it (thinner posts and spread just a tad more).

Beavertail Rogers = Standard lugs

BnB Rogers = classic lugs (and maybe Standard)

cool stuff.

Posted on 15 years ago
#40
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here